![]() ![]() Schiller said that Apple did not just support open standards, but wanted to embrace them in Mac OS X. OS X really was an all-new operating system.Īqua was a big departure from OS 8 and 9’s Platinum theme, but the company worked to return some of old OS’ features - like spring-loaded folders - to OS X.Īs time has moved on, most users have come to think of Mac OS X’s features and behaviors as “Mac-like,” forgetting how it used to be. It could prove unstable and didn’t offer a lot of modern technologies found on other systems. Let’s look at a few of these goals 1 with that timeframe in mind: The Power of Unix and the Simplicity of MacĪt the time, there was a lot of concern that Mac OS X left behind a lot of the design elements (and quirks) that made the classic Mac OS so lovable. Sierra and Puma have a lot in common, but it’s clear that the 15 years between them have brought a ton of change and a lot of improvements. I think this list is really interesting to consider today. Before the 10.1 demo, Schiller discussed the goals Apple had for Mac OS X beyond its desired longevity. Mac OS X 10.1 was an important releases, but it is not the only thing worth noting in this announcement. As recently as the OS X Mavericks keynote, Apple has talked about the future of the operating system in terms of a “decade or more.” I don’t think a huge change like the OS 9/OS X transition is coming anytime soon, but that macOS will continue to slowly and quietly evolve and improve over the next many years. In that keynote - which has been mostly forgotten today - Schiller said that Mac OS X was designed to power the Mac “at least fifteen years, or more.” “Most programmers go on vacation after a major release,” said Jobs, “but Avie Tevanian and his team have kept working to improve Mac OS X.” Jobs said that Mac OS X already has one major update before Windows XP even ships. He ended his part by saying that he has been impressed with the speed of Apple’s OS division’s development of Mac OS X 10.1. Jobs continued with the clock metaphor, saying that Mac OS X’s original release was noon, and that we are now at six o’clock. ![]() “Now is the time to upgrade,” said Jobs, “this is the mainstream release.” Kbase Article of the Week: Mac OS X 10.1: Some Preferences Lost After Using 10.1 Upgrade CD →Ī month or so before introducing the original iPod, Steve Jobs and Phil Schiller stood on stage at Seybold and announced that Mac OS X 10.1 was shipping shortly: Joe Rossignol at MacRumors brings this point up:Īpple has also yet to remove “Mid” from its “Mid 2014” MacBook Pro, despite the fact that it was the only MacBook Pro model released in 2014, so this appears to be a clear deviation from the company’s traditional nomenclature. Since there weren’t any other MacBook Pros released in 2016, maybe Apple felt that the exact classification wasn’t needed. For example, my college roommate had a PowerBook G4 (15-inch FW800) while I had a slightly-newer - and slightly-faster - PowerBook G4 (15-inch 1.5/1.33 GHz).Īfter the switch to Intel, Apple moved to a more sane naming scheme that used the time of the product’s release in the name, as you can see from this list of iMacs in Mactracker:īy removing the “Late” label, Apple’s broken that tradition a little bit. In the PowerPC days, model names would be set by the processor speed or a new feature found in the product. This may seem like a silly topic for a blog post, but it is a break with tradition, and I do love traditions. As spotted by Pike’s Universum, Apple has dropped the “Late” from the current MacBook Pro’s full “AppleCare” name. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |